| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
201. Sticky:New dev blog: Capital ship balancing - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Scatim Helicon wrote: Malcanis wrote: The number of supercap pilots with incredibly unreliable connections amazes me. It's a mystery how you ever managed to amass the price of a super, what with your ISP kicking you off the server every 1000...
- by Demon Azrakel - at 2011.10.11 21:14:00
|
202. Sticky:New dev blog: Capital ship balancing - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
kralz wrote: Demon Azrakel wrote: kralz wrote: Demon Azrakel wrote: kralz wrote: Diminishing returns on investment is how eve works, just because the ship costs 10x as much, it should not be 10x as good. ATM, sc cost 10x what a ca...
- by Demon Azrakel - at 2011.10.11 21:12:00
|
203. Sticky:New dev blog: Capital ship balancing - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Velin Dhal wrote: Andreus Ixiris wrote: Aurora Egnald wrote: Dont need to , thats why I have an alt. Anything I want to say, I say with my main. What are you afraid of? Aurora Egnald wrote: Posting under my alt does not take anyhti...
- by Demon Azrakel - at 2011.10.11 21:09:00
|
204. Sticky:New dev blog: Capital ship balancing - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
kralz wrote: Demon Azrakel wrote: kralz wrote: Diminishing returns on investment is how eve works, just because the ship costs 10x as much, it should not be 10x as good. ATM, sc cost 10x what a carrier costs, does 10x dps, has 20x the t...
- by Demon Azrakel - at 2011.10.11 21:04:00
|
205. Sticky:New dev blog: Capital ship balancing - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
kralz wrote: Diminishing returns on investment is how eve works, just because the ship costs 10x as much, it should not be 10x as good. ATM, sc cost 10x what a carrier costs, does 10x dps, has 20x the tank, and is ewar immune. this is far, fa...
- by Demon Azrakel - at 2011.10.11 20:56:00
|
206. Sticky:New dev blog: Capital ship balancing - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Aurora Egnald wrote: Velin Dhal wrote: Tippia wrote: Velin Dhal wrote: Oh I think I see now. There you go again, not knowing anything about supercaps and basic mechanics. I know plenty about it. I also know that not a single one o...
- by Demon Azrakel - at 2011.10.11 20:54:00
|
207. Sticky:New dev blog: Capital ship balancing - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Aurora Egnald wrote: Tippia wrote: Velin Dhal wrote: Your acting like Super Caps are ruining this game. GǪand they are, since we've arrived at a situation where the answer is increasingly Gǣmore capsGǥ. The mere fact that those who a...
- by Demon Azrakel - at 2011.10.11 20:51:00
|
208. Sticky:New dev blog: Capital ship balancing - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Nabuch Sattva wrote: Ganthrithor wrote: Evil Celeste wrote: Ganthrithor wrote: [quote=Tippia] Thanks for misconstruing my argument. What I'm saying is, there's no reason to ever promote the purchasing of supercarriers if what you're ...
- by Demon Azrakel - at 2011.10.11 20:29:00
|
209. Sticky:New dev blog: Capital ship balancing - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Avon wrote: Tippia wrote: [I get that cost is not a balancing factor. That's all there is to get. I have read you post this many times in this thread, but I don't understand the basis of your argument. Are you saying that ships should no...
- by Demon Azrakel - at 2011.10.11 20:23:00
|
210. Sticky:New dev blog: Capital ship balancing - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Damian Gene wrote: Princess Cellestia wrote: Damian Gene wrote: Ok, well much has been said about this. First off, I fly subcaps. Second off, I fly a HIC (Onyx actualy) So your telling me now, that I can point a titan and all I need to d...
- by Demon Azrakel - at 2011.10.11 20:19:00
|
211. Sticky:New dev blog: Capital ship balancing - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Princess Cellestia wrote: Damian Gene wrote: Ok, well much has been said about this. First off, I fly subcaps. Second off, I fly a HIC (Onyx actualy) So your telling me now, that I can point a titan and all I need to do is orbit with an aft...
- by Demon Azrakel - at 2011.10.11 20:17:00
|
212. Sticky:New dev blog: Capital ship balancing - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
thebarry wrote: Carabusu wrote: thebarry wrote: I like these changes a lot, but POS Gunning will also have to be rebalanced IMO. The 5 minute timer on dreads will make it pretty much impossible for pos gunners to kill them. Previously we...
- by Demon Azrakel - at 2011.10.11 20:16:00
|
213. Sticky:New dev blog: Capital ship balancing - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Misanth wrote: Pandi V wrote: I think a lot of people are forgetting that Supercarriers and Titans are supposed to be alliance assets not player assets, which means that whether you can successfully field them or not, should be an indica...
- by Demon Azrakel - at 2011.10.11 20:14:00
|
214. Sticky:New dev blog: Capital ship balancing - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Unforgiven Storm wrote: (Declaration of interests: I have no super carrier, I don't like them, I want them all dead) So, we have this super carrier problem in 0.0 and this nerf is going to address this issue. In general I agree with it and mos...
- by Demon Azrakel - at 2011.10.11 20:13:00
|
215. Sticky:New dev blog: Capital ship balancing - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Carabusu wrote: xxxak wrote: Update: This nerf = Win Subcap battle, Kill all supers on the field. So with this nerf, supers can no longer defend themselves from subcaps, and supers are committed for 23 hours once they cyno in. That m...
- by Demon Azrakel - at 2011.10.11 20:12:00
|
216. Sticky:New dev blog: Capital ship balancing - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Forlorn Wongraven wrote: Evil Celeste wrote: Malcanis wrote: Hypothetically they could also accept that they should risk losing their ships as well. Havent you heard? They paid 20b for their ship and they pay for another account, so ...
- by Demon Azrakel - at 2011.10.11 20:09:00
|
217. Sticky:New dev blog: Capital ship balancing - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Cpt Tunguska wrote: This whole thing will be a hidden titan buff. I mean hitpoints of all ships are reduced by 20%, Dreads and Carriers dont get any HP changes.....but the DD remains at 3 million dmg/shot. This means its a huuuge DD buff. The ...
- by Demon Azrakel - at 2011.10.11 20:05:00
|
218. Sticky:New dev blog: Capital ship balancing - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Misanth wrote: Vile rat wrote: Supercarriers were originally ships that were a modest increase over regular carriers and grotesquely priced as to be an end game ego ship. They were neat and something you pointed at "ooh look at that!" but no...
- by Demon Azrakel - at 2011.10.11 20:00:00
|
219. Sticky:New dev blog: Capital ship balancing - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Malcanis wrote: Anile8er wrote: Many years ago, before many of the people whining about supercaps being to powerful started playing this game, CCP's CEO said EVE should be about choices. Clearly with the changes CCP is presenting for superca...
- by Demon Azrakel - at 2011.10.11 19:58:00
|
220. Sticky:New dev blog: Capital ship balancing - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Obsidian Hawk wrote: Grath Telkin wrote: SERIOUSLY LETS PAY ATTENTION REALLY QUICK . AN 900 MILLION ISK CARRIER CAN LAUNCH 10 WARRIOR 2'S TO DEFEND ITSELF FROM A SABER BUT AN 18 BILLION ISK SUPER CARRIER CAN'T. Th...
- by Demon Azrakel - at 2011.10.11 18:38:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |